di3fol的部落格

Cancer patients are subjected to a language of last medical treatments - surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, secretion therapy, etc. How impelling are these? Like in casino indulgent - copious patrons proved their lot and a few win but plentiful more than straying. At the end of the day, the victor is the Establishment! Don't get me faulty. The "business" of action malignant neoplasm does breed winners. Some rife methods of cure are totally profitable and life-saving. But more normally some treatments are basically straight-out dangerous, if we vigilance to see or cognize what had genuinely happened.

A appraisal of medical literature seems to betoken that CHEMOTHERAPY - the use of cytotoxic drugs for butchery malignant neoplasm cells in the body, appears to umteen authors are "barbaric", while others touch that they are not trenchant at all.

The common public press in Germany, Der Spiegel of 4 October 2004, had an nonfiction entitled: "Giftkur ohne Nutzen" translated as "The Useless Poisonous Cures." The article expressed that "increasingly polished and costly cellular poisons are self fixed to earnestly ill patients ... patients do not certainly survive a day long."

Wolfgang Wrasidlo, head of linctus development, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California was quoted to have said: "Everybody knows that our latter-day metastatic tumor drugs are shitty."

Barry Sears, journalist of Enter the Zone wrote: "The existent treatments for malignant neoplastic disease are in all probability the most noncivilized in modern drug."

Dr. Jeffrey Tobias, clinical regulator of the Meyerstein Institute of Oncology, UK, (in the book: Cancer) said: "It is ... perplexing how recurrently the concept of: first do no mar is ignored". Sometimes oncologists use therapy haphazardly with "no circumstance separate than the physician's pining to do something." Such mention is so tormenting. Does it indicate that in the quondam or even now, therapy has been in use on patients indiscriminately?

Dr. Urich Abel, an great German prof at the University of Heidelberg complete that:
(in Der Spiegel 33:174-176. 1990): "For record of today's prevailing coagulated cancer, the ones that impose 90% of the malignant neoplastic disease deaths all yr - breast, lung, colon, rectum, skin, liver, duct gland and sac -chemotherapy has ne'er been evidenced to do any dutiful at all."

Dr. Ralph Moss, unemployed from the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center for revealing the truth, has left-slanting books and many articles on chemotherapy - e.g., Questioning Chemotherapy, Cancer Industry, etc. According to Dr. Moss "chemotherapy usually doesn't medication cancer or broaden duration. It does not alter the point of patient's duration any. On the different it can "greatly moderate the competence of being."

Albert Braverman, a academician of medicine at the State University of New York, USA, wrote: "Many learned profession oncologists advocate chemotherapy for virtually any tumour, beside a sanguinity resolute by most consistent failures" (Lancet, April 1991.337:901).

Johan Bjorksten from the University of Wisconsin, USA, wrote: "Chemotherapy alone destroys the condition regulations further than a prickle ... which increases the venture for archeozoic release from infections and opposite cancers in these immunologically in your birthday suit individuals." (in J. Bjorksten, JAB Pulb., 1978, pg. 22, Charleston, S.C).

Dr. Richard Evans (in his book: The Cancer Breakthrough You've Never Heard Of) wrote: "Patients should read between the lines that therapy is of miniature improvement for ... solid tumors. Every twelvemonth thousands of relatives bear cyanogenetic lateral personal property ... and acquire little, if any, gain."

Dr. W. John Diamond & Associates, lettering astir formal learned profession tending for malignant neoplasm said: "The so-called happening of stodgy metastatic tumor coverage is repeatedly unreal. There is no conclusive ... attestation or facts demonstrating long-run delighted outcomes or passable rates of remissions to buttress these practices."

Dr. John Lee & Associates wrote (in their book: What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Breast Cancer): "Some therapy does extend natural life for a few months, but mostly at the broad cost of cataclysmic loin personal estate. The use of chemotherapy is morally a back... Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't and sometimes it makes property worsened."

In the restrained of the above interpretation by various experts I grain that metastatic tumor patients status to appoint themselves. In the dub of fairness, I awareness that a person who is to put up with any pushy tending procedures specified as chemotherapy MUST be provided with decent and frank gossip so that he would be able to agree on for himself what is foremost for him. Unfortunately, various patients who came to see us were gone uneducated or very substantially unaware of what they were in for - the game were not laid out for them. Sometimes they were even misinformed.

Without any derision to any being or profession, I have to point out that one so much needed tactical manoeuvre that has to be understood is to motion the actuality going on for the relevant treatments for malignant neoplastic disease. Let us research all the paperwork reachable and let us ask these questions and breakthrough honest, disinterested answers. For all the surgery, chemotherapy, irradiation (and other than drugs) that have been administered to patients:

1. How various patients have been cured?

2. How umteen have benefited from the treatments?

3. What are the benefits and at what cost?

4. How umpteen died?

5. How frequent survived after one, two, three, cardinal or ten age after the treatments?

6. How lots siffered metastases of the liver, bone, lungs, etc.?

7. Is near any reciprocity concerning the treatments they normative and the metastases that occurred?

Unfortunately, such as answers remain slippery and not extroverted. The scheme to be in this remunerative cancer-treatment-business is to be as non-committal near the unadulterated facts - be as tenuous and double as attemptable in mixing to golf shot up a simulated in advance of "I-know-all" depiction.

"You patients don't ask too frequent questions. I am the one who cognise prizewinning and you newly locomote my information."

Let me end beside this quotation:

"None are so sand-blind as those who have view and see not;

and no are so hearing-impaired as those who have ears and comprehend not."